![]() You’ll find a link to a PDF containing all my timings in the Extra Credit section below. However, both versions of Compressor consistently failed to compress a ProRes 4444 file into HEVC 10-bit, while AME compresses it easily – and quickly.īased on these findings, you’ll find Compressor performance for the new version essentially the same as the older version, while Adobe Media Encoder will be significantly faster compressing material for H.264.Compressor 4.4.5 is, on average, 45% faster than AME 2019 when compressing HEVC 8-bit footage.Compressor 4.4.5 is, on average, 36% slower than AME 2019 when compressing the same footage into H.264.The latest version of Compressor is about 8% faster when compressing for HEVC 8-bit, compared to the earlier version.The latest version of Compressor (4.4.5) is 29% slower, on average, when compressing for H.264 when compared to the previous version of Compressor.The test movies used three different source codecs: XDCAM EX, ProRes 422 HQ and ProRes 4444. While both Compressor and AME support a wide variety of codecs, I tested two of the most popular delivery codecs: H.264 and HEVC. ![]() Then, because Compressor speeds have often lagged the competition, I also decided to compare the compression speeds of the latest version of Compressor to the current version of Adobe Media Encoder Since all of us rely on compression to deliver our final projects, I wanted to see how much improvement Apple made to this essential software. One of the key features in the update was improved performance. Apple released the latest version of Compressor (4.4.5) last Monday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |